Evangelos Fragkoulis,
General Secretary of the Greek Union
of General Practitioners 
The current economic crisis hit Greece more severely than 
any other European country, posing a direct threat to health, but
                  also offering the Greek health system a ‘questionable’
 advantage – an opportunity to redesign the whole approach to 
healthcare.
                  The political will to confront the interests of 
professional and social groups has been strengthened by the economic 
threats.
                  The implementation of deep, strategic changes is 
critical, with the key targets being ‘value for money’ and effective and
                  efficient allocation of the scarce resources.
               
What has been the response of the government 
to date? The most radical change was the merging of health insurance 
funds and
                  the establishment of EOPYY, (National Organization for
 Healthcare Provision), a monopolistic purchaser with enhanced 
negotiating
                  powers.1
 The formulation of a common package of benefits has offered the means 
to eliminate social inequalities. The next most important
                  measure was the launch of an electronic prescribing 
system, which enables monitoring of doctors’ behaviour. Clinical 
practice
                  guidelines for common diseases were developed, aiming 
to provide evidence-based and safe practice. Other measures were imposed
                  to tighten control over pharmaceutical expenditure.
               
What still needs to be done? Health coverage 
must become a universal right based on citizenship, rather than an 
employment
                  benefit – this is essential while the unemployment 
rates rise. Re-orientation of the health system to primary care and 
public
                  health is now more necessary than ever. A primary care
 network must be established which functionally integrates public and
                  private providers. The ‘family doctor’ system must be 
implemented, with responsibility for referring patients to other health
                  services, ensuring continuous care. Citizens must have
 free choice of their personal doctor. The lack of GPs can be addressed
                  by attracting specialists to retrain ‘on the job’ as 
GPs. Physicians’ compensation by the public sector must be fair, 
otherwise
                  they will not abandon opportunistic practices. 
Changing the compensation system offers the opportunity to offer 
incentives
                  to physicians to be more productive and effective. 
Family doctors could be reimbursed by a hybrid system of ‘capitation’ 
and
                  ‘pay for performance’, linking payments to outcomes, 
and specialists could be paid by a combination of ‘fee for service’ and
                  ‘global budget’. This would foster competition among 
physicians, but would also discourage them from inducing demand and 
promote
                  better geographical distribution in the country. The 
introduction of electronic medical records is critical for the 
enhancement
                  of efficiency of the system and also for monitoring 
physicians’ behavior and conformity with clinical guidelines. Auditing
                  mechanisms are necessary. Finally, more resources 
should be allocated to prevention and health promotion policies – 
unhealthy
                  lifestyles are popular in Greece and hamper the 
efficiency of the system.2,3
Budget cuts without major reforms will lead 
to a Greek ‘health tragedy’, but I strongly believe that the opportunity
 to re-engineer
                  health service, thereby treating the inefficiencies of
 the past, can offer the entire population access to quality healthcare
                  while keeping the cost in check.
               

