Σάββατο 29 Σεπτεμβρίου 2012

Economic crisis and Primary Health Care in Greece: “disaster” or “blessing”?



Crisis hit Greece more severely than any other European country posing a direct threat to health, but also offers  Greek Health System a “questionable” advantage- an opportunity to redesign the whole approach to healthcare. Political will to conflict with interests of professional and social groups, in front of the threat has been strengthen. Implementation of deep, strategic changes is critical. Key target of an extensive reform is the “value for money”- effective and efficient allocation of the scarce resources.
What was the response of the government till now? The most radical change was the  merging of health insurance funds and the establishment of  the unified “EOPYY”, a monopsony purchaser with enhanced negotiating power. The formulation of a common package of benefits eliminates social inequalities. Next most important measure taken was the launch of an electronic prescribing system, which enables monitoring doctors’ behaviour. Clinical practice guidelines for common diseases were developed, aiming to provide evidence based and safe practice. Lots of measures were imposed in order to tighten control over pharmaceutical expenditure.
What must be done?  Health coverage must become a universal right based on citizenship, rather than an employment benefit and is essential while the unemployment rates rise. Re-orientation of the Health System to PC and Public Health is necessary now more than ever. Restructuring the fragmented PC is a high priority issue. A PC Network must be established with functional integration of  public and private PC providers. The “family doctor” institution must be implemented, with responsibility for referring patients to other health services, ensuring continuous care.  Citizens must have free choice of their personal doctor. The lack of GPs can be faced by attracting specialists to follow “on the job” training to become GPs. Physicians’ compensation by the public sector must be fair, otherwise they will not abandon  opportunistic behaviours. Changing the compensation system can impose incentives to the physicians to be more productive and effective. Family doctors can be reimbursed by a hybrid system of “capitation” and “pay for performance”- linking payments to outcomes. Specialists could be paid by a combination of “fee for service” and “global budget”. This would foster competition among physicians, but also will discourage them from inducing demand and will  promote the better geographical distribution . The introduction of electronic medical records is critical for the enhancement of efficiency of the system and also for monitoring physicians’ behaviour and conformity with clinical guidelines.  Auditing mechanisms are necessary. More resources must be allocated to prevention and health promotion policies. Unhealthy lifestyles are popular in Greece and hamper the efficiency of the system.
I strongly believe that taking advantage of the opportunity to re-engineer the Greek PC and the NHS generally, treating the inefficiencies of the past, will guarantee the entire population access to quality health care while keeping the cost in check. Budget cuts without major reforms will lead to a  Greek “Health Tragedy”.

Evangelos Fragkoulis,
General Secretary of the Greek Union of General Practitioners

References
1)      Mossialos E, Allin S, Davaki K. Analysing the Greek health system: a tale of fragmentation and inertia. Health Econ 2005; 14 (suppl 1): S151-S168
2)      Economou C. Greece: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2010, 12(7):1–180
3)      OECD (2011), Health at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2011-en